Facing public backlash, some health care companies are abandoning hospital deals

Worried about hospitals closing and higher costs for patients, state lawmakers are increasingly tangling with hospitals over potential health care mergers, in some cases derailing deals they think don’t serve the public interest.

Financially strapped hospitals often look to merge with or be acquired by other systems. After a pandemic-era slowdown, health care mergers and acquisitions have risen steadily over the past two years. But some proposed hospital deals in Connecticut, Louisiana, Minnesota and elsewhere have fizzled amid heavy pushback from lawmakers, organized labor and grassroots organizations.

At least 10 health care “megadeals” were called off or unwound just last year, due in part to increased oversight, reported Becker’s Hospital Review, an industry publication.

“We have seen situations nationally in certain health care transactions where a lot of promises were made, but when you look into it, clinics are closing, prices are going up, access is down,” Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, a Democrat, said.

People are also reading…

  • Incarnate Word basketball coach Dan Rolfes suffers medical emergency after state semifinal
  • Girl injured in fight near Hazelwood East has brain bleeding, skull fracture, family says
  • Woman hiding from gunshots in The Grove run over by car, dragged. ‘This horrific event.’
  • Incarnate Word battles through sorrow, pain to capture 7th successive state championship
  • Will teen in fight near Hazelwood East be charged as an adult? A judge may decide.
  • Hochman: Caitlin Clark inspires nationally, but Iowa’s Kate Martin from Edwardsville does so locally
  • Teen girl still in critical condition after fight near Hazelwood East High School
  • Some students leave early, police investigate threats after fight near Hazelwood East
  • Former St. Louis publisher Ray Hartmann running for Congress; hopes to defeat Ann Wagner
  • Democrats derail Missouri Senate after Republican’s comments on initiative petitions
  • Hochman: Remember Laila? Now 15, Blues fan who overcame rare disease plays hockey (and even won a Cup!)
  • Messenger: Grocery worker who faced armed man sees larger issues. ‘There’s no decency.’
  • Boy, 14, dies after being stabbed during fight near Jennings Junior High School
  • Pregnant St. Louis teacher killed as ‘web of lies’ unraveled, prosecutors say
  • Fontbonne closure brings tears, and questions about the future of higher education

Ellison was in the middle of campaigning for reelection in late 2022 when he learned that Minnesota-based Fairview Health Services intended to merge with Sanford Health, a larger South Dakota-based health care system.

The proposed deal drew intense criticism from Minnesota’s Democratic legislators, from nurses unions, University of Minnesota leaders and community groups. Fairview owns the University of Minnesota Medical Center, which is funded by state taxpayers. If the systems merged, Minnesota tax dollars might be spent across state lines. Some legislators also argued the resulting system would create a local health care monopoly that could lead to fewer services and higher costs for patients.

As the Fairview-Sanford deal chugged along, Ellison’s office held public listening sessions across the state. And while Fairview and Sanford officials said the merger would allow the systems to expand care and some residents expressed support for the deal, the overall sentiment from stakeholders was negative, Ellison recalled.

Meanwhile, Democratic lawmakers passed a bill in May 2023 that bans anti-competitive health care mergers and strengthens state oversight of potential deals. It was signed into law that month.

Two months later, Sanford Health called off the merger due to a lack of support from “certain Minnesota stakeholders.”

In March 2023, Massachusetts-based Covenant Health called off its plan to purchase a smaller, struggling health care system in the rural northeast corner of Connecticut. More than a quarter of announced health care deals in the United States last year involved a financially distressed partner, according to consultancy KaufmanHall.

Community groups rallied against the deal, concerned that Covenant’s takeover would lead to cuts in reproductive care and other services. Covenant is a Catholic system and follows a set of rules called the Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services, which forbids the system from providing some types of health care. Those include emergency contraception, fertility services, gender-affirming care, abortion and some end-of-life care.

“My concerns were really rooted in the fact that it was a Catholic-affiliated health care institution that follows Catholic directives,” Connecticut state Rep. Jillian Gilchrest, a Democrat, told Stateline. “There was a concern that women in the northeast corner of Connecticut wouldn’t have access to reproductive health care.”

Some area residents worried they’d lose their hospital without Covenant’s takeover, but others formed a coalition that called on the state to deny the proposed acquisition. Gilchrest joined 15 other Democratic state legislators in signing a letter opposing the deal.

It fell through a few months later.

Covenant President/CEO Steve Grubbs said in a statement announcing the deal’s cancellation that “the affiliation was no longer financially viable.”

Day Kimball Healthcare CEO R. Kyle Kramer said the system’s leadership was “disappointed” by Covenant’s decision not to acquire it.

“We are immediately pursuing the best path forward for Day Kimball and look forward to working with local and state officials as well as exploring discussions with other potential future partners to preserve essential hospital services in the northeastern Connecticut community,” Kramer’s statement read.

Gilchrest said she hopes Connecticut lawmakers will do more to protect services being eliminated following some hospital mergers, particularly women’s health services.

“Unfortunately, I feel like we have not been able to go far enough yet,” she told Stateline. “As a result of many of these mergers, when it comes to women’s reproductive health care, we continue to see the closure of services like labor and delivery units across Connecticut.”

This year in Louisiana, pushback from state lawmakers and community groups paused a proposed $2.5 billion sale of the nonprofit Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana to for-profit insurance giant Elevance Health. Blue Cross defended the proposed sale by saying it would help the nonprofit insurer slow rising health care costs and better compete with its national rivals.

Last month, Louisiana state senators sent a report to the state insurance commissioner outlining dozens of concerns over the fairness of the deal, alleged attempts by Blue Cross to influence policyholders’ votes, and Elevance’s “troubled” history of fines, penalties, lawsuits and premium increases.

Louisiana state Sen. Jeremy Stine, a Republican, said he plans to introduce a bill this legislative session that would prevent deals like the proposed Blue Cross sale from taking effect without meeting certain consumer protection standards.

“By implementing these safeguards, we aim to prevent any undue influence, personal gain, or hasty decision-making that may compromise the health and well-being of our community,” Stine said in a statement sent to Stateline.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *